Chief Commissioner being the SUPER BOSS just wants to implement what so ever comes in her mind. Starting from Commissioner level to Assistant commissioner (the junior most cadre in IRS) due to their paralytical position being under and junior to her, knows the real fact but not coming forward openly to say, that her desire to create new policy not only unpractical as well as unproductive rehearsal on the name of exposure and good administration.
In the meeting paper circulated for the meeting held on 26/05/11 and 31/05/11 from the administration so many times, it is repeated that there will not be major displacement of the field officer i.e. Inspector and Superintendent, than anybody who have even a basic knowledge of administration will ask, than how it will be implemented and why there is a need to frame and put a new policy.
The present policy proving very well and stream line exposure to the field staff in their field work. Will Chief Commissioner put on records how the field staff will be benefited in their work execution and how much department will get more revenue on account of implementation of her so called new policy? Definitely the true answer will be NOTHING and NONE; it will just satisfy the ego of chief commissioner. Because every Commissionerate having full in-depth built up strength to give exposure to its working force. Every Commissionerate having same work of Central Excise, Customs, and Service Tax. And every where the work is being executed under the same law, there is no different law in different Commissionerate.
Instead of focusing on this type of unrealistic and unproductive approach towards the administration if Madam had concentrated and have taken care of creating good infrastructure and timely and effective training for the field force, she could have been admired by everyone. Madam, during the visit of lower formation, Commissionerate to OUT POST Place, what you find on the name of infrastructure. From years to years either hired building, no proper office accommodation for field staff (Exempt IRS, as they have been provided fully air condition rooms, May not be legally entitle)
Have Madam ever think about the training and refreshing courses for field staff, none of the IRS posted before years of training to their duty and what on the part of Inspector, a newly promoted /recruited inspector get posted to field formation and from the beginning day he is held responsible for every act. In fact lack of effective and timely training is responsible, if there is any deficiency, merely by rotation/ transfer, deficiency cannot be eradicated, as the person/mind remain the same just the place of work get changed. Just change of place does not enhance the efficiency; infect proper training should be provided and that too in time. It is evident from the transfer and rotation policy of the IRS, they are transferred and rotated within 1 or 2 years, if merely change of place can enhance efficiency and can provide exposure to work than why they are being sent for training and refreshing courses from time to time since their birth in the department to till they retire.
The fact is, at lower formation called as OUT POST/out sector there is no office building (to think about basic facility like drinking water, and proper sitting accommodation , vehicle etc is a matter not to discuss) , anybody can imagine the worst infrastructure condition, and still all the higher ups sitting in air condition room (for which even they are not entitle), using departmental vehicle for their personal and family use, desire that the field officer should give 100% fight against the terror attack for which almost every week they issue /circulate the alert notice etc.
The office recognized as office of the Inspector/ Superintendent, but no basic infrastructure available. No housing accommodation. Instead of wasting time to make new policy if the Chief Commissioner had used her good office to develop/ create a good infrastructure for field formation where inspector /superintendent perform their duty, chief commissioner may have been remembered for ever for her creative work. Will madam like to answer, at how many places in her tenure on her efforts office building or housing infrastructure has been developed, the answer will come Nil, if any how at some places its coming it’s the effort of the officers, who had given her legacy. And she wants to change the policy framed by them.
So to establish upon that existing policy not provide equal opportunity in terms of exposure and neither do the support capacity building is nothing but merely using the dictionary word just used to impress upon on the reader, as the commercial companies do to sell out their product in competitive market.
Madam on the name of exposure, you IRS officers had already done a deep harm to the department and given a lot of exposure to the field officer………………………., if that will come to the knowledge to the outsiders (though now it has started come to their knowledge) still there is time, that in favour of department as well as officer, you really do what is expected from your office and for which you have been paid from the pocket of tax payer citizens.
Jai Hind.
In the meeting paper circulated for the meeting held on 26/05/11 and 31/05/11 from the administration so many times, it is repeated that there will not be major displacement of the field officer i.e. Inspector and Superintendent, than anybody who have even a basic knowledge of administration will ask, than how it will be implemented and why there is a need to frame and put a new policy.
The present policy proving very well and stream line exposure to the field staff in their field work. Will Chief Commissioner put on records how the field staff will be benefited in their work execution and how much department will get more revenue on account of implementation of her so called new policy? Definitely the true answer will be NOTHING and NONE; it will just satisfy the ego of chief commissioner. Because every Commissionerate having full in-depth built up strength to give exposure to its working force. Every Commissionerate having same work of Central Excise, Customs, and Service Tax. And every where the work is being executed under the same law, there is no different law in different Commissionerate.
Instead of focusing on this type of unrealistic and unproductive approach towards the administration if Madam had concentrated and have taken care of creating good infrastructure and timely and effective training for the field force, she could have been admired by everyone. Madam, during the visit of lower formation, Commissionerate to OUT POST Place, what you find on the name of infrastructure. From years to years either hired building, no proper office accommodation for field staff (Exempt IRS, as they have been provided fully air condition rooms, May not be legally entitle)
Have Madam ever think about the training and refreshing courses for field staff, none of the IRS posted before years of training to their duty and what on the part of Inspector, a newly promoted /recruited inspector get posted to field formation and from the beginning day he is held responsible for every act. In fact lack of effective and timely training is responsible, if there is any deficiency, merely by rotation/ transfer, deficiency cannot be eradicated, as the person/mind remain the same just the place of work get changed. Just change of place does not enhance the efficiency; infect proper training should be provided and that too in time. It is evident from the transfer and rotation policy of the IRS, they are transferred and rotated within 1 or 2 years, if merely change of place can enhance efficiency and can provide exposure to work than why they are being sent for training and refreshing courses from time to time since their birth in the department to till they retire.
The fact is, at lower formation called as OUT POST/out sector there is no office building (to think about basic facility like drinking water, and proper sitting accommodation , vehicle etc is a matter not to discuss) , anybody can imagine the worst infrastructure condition, and still all the higher ups sitting in air condition room (for which even they are not entitle), using departmental vehicle for their personal and family use, desire that the field officer should give 100% fight against the terror attack for which almost every week they issue /circulate the alert notice etc.
The office recognized as office of the Inspector/ Superintendent, but no basic infrastructure available. No housing accommodation. Instead of wasting time to make new policy if the Chief Commissioner had used her good office to develop/ create a good infrastructure for field formation where inspector /superintendent perform their duty, chief commissioner may have been remembered for ever for her creative work. Will madam like to answer, at how many places in her tenure on her efforts office building or housing infrastructure has been developed, the answer will come Nil, if any how at some places its coming it’s the effort of the officers, who had given her legacy. And she wants to change the policy framed by them.
So to establish upon that existing policy not provide equal opportunity in terms of exposure and neither do the support capacity building is nothing but merely using the dictionary word just used to impress upon on the reader, as the commercial companies do to sell out their product in competitive market.
Madam on the name of exposure, you IRS officers had already done a deep harm to the department and given a lot of exposure to the field officer………………………., if that will come to the knowledge to the outsiders (though now it has started come to their knowledge) still there is time, that in favour of department as well as officer, you really do what is expected from your office and for which you have been paid from the pocket of tax payer citizens.
Jai Hind.
